![]() |
| The great times at the rooftop hotel pool are done |
![]() |
| Setting up short-lived massage joint on the Main above Duluth |
Thirdly, Jeanne D'Arc Lavoie, 82, stopped paying her Readers' Digest subscription because she felt they were leading her on about her chances of winning prizes. Not only did she not pay the $478 she owed, she also sued them for $7,000. The woman was represented by her daughter Linda Tremblay against the corporate beheamouth whose lawyer goes unnamed. Tremblay described her mother as a poor widow who never worked and never had much money because she spent her time raising her three daughters. They complained about such phrases as "you satisfy the criteria of gaining maximum priveleges," and "$772,000 in prizes, priority notice to Jeanne D'Arc Lavoie, who was apparently sucked into spending on more useless junk in the notion that it would lead her to win prizes. Somewhat amazingly the small claims court judge Alain Breault sided with her and rewarded her $4,000 + in the Feb 14 decision.


"In the end the women involved need to remember just one thing: The only ones who should feel any shame are the men who prey on girls." Quoted from the award-winning report you mentionned. Am I the only one who thinks this tendancy to penalize the clients is getting a bit scary? I mean is it so bad to try to release some sexual tension? I'm not talking about minors here; but it's very revealing to see how it is assumed in this report that all massage parlours hire minors, and that all prostitutes are victims. Funny also how that social worker (or RCMP officer) does not find it odd that some victims just don't know they are victims... Things are maybe a bit more complicated than this report claims...
ReplyDeleteI think in order for that argument to make any sense, you first have to accept the premise that you are hurting somebody by using them to offer you sexual services.... I guess there could be an argument made to that effect, but it could also be argued that in fact you are helping them by giving them money....It probably varies from case to case and is, even then, difficult to judge... So I am not really one to say someone should feel shame for going to a massage parlour for fun....
ReplyDeleteA pink slipper with fake jewels is telling us what is trite and tacky?
ReplyDeleteHeifers? I can't imagine where that high horse of yours comes from, given the lack of respect for women you demonstrate.
Actually, Kristian, I too am at a loss as to why that particular photo would be chosen as this blog's latest "logo".
ReplyDeleteWould you take one of those girls home for dinner? Would anyone?
Besides, anyone discovering this site for the first time could easily question the website's overall intent.