Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Demolition of iconic CNR office building: an illegal act

   Southwest borough mayor Benoit Dorais has confirmed to Coolopolis that he watched on helplessly as the historic, abandoned old Grand Trunk/ Canadian National Railways office building at Bridge and Wellington was illegally demolished last winter by Ray-Mont Logisitics, which was hired by a condo company which is planning to put up condos at the corner.
   The company has been fined by the borough, he reports, and the case is in the courts as we speak, or write, or type or whatever we're doing here.
   There appears to have been little outrage following this demolition, which is unfortunate.
   In the mid-70s heritage activists were outraged when similar illegal (or otherwise dodgy) demolitions were undertaken around Montreal, most notably the Van Horne Mansion. That demolition at NE Drummond and Sherbrooke in 1973 so outraged Montrealers that David Azrieli's reputation was permanently tarnished following the affair, leading him to spend more time in Israel than in Montreal, where he was the province's third wealthiest resident. Azrieli died last week and the issue was raised prominently in the notice.
As it looks now
   Now while this building was no Van Horne mansion, it was the most important of a series of buildings used in the administration of a busy area that included slaughterhouses a stone's throw away from Goose Village.
   I asked Dorais which company the developers hired to demolish the premises but he replied that it was the Ray-Mont crews themselves who took the lovely old building down.
   We at Coolopolis feel that the developers should be forced to rebuild the same building and integrated it into their condo project and whoever actually issued the order should face legal sanctions.
    The demolition also raises fears that a similar abandoned old structure a little further down Bridge (in front of Costco) could fall victim to a similar fate.
  The once-lively area was devastated by a series of expropriations in the 1960s. Here's a list of events that took place in the area over the years.

On Thursday Dorais confirmed in a tweet that the borough is indeed arguing in court to force the property owners to rebuild the demolished building.



Dorais later rephrased his comments, noting that ordering the rebuilding of a building in such bad shape would seem a stretch, but that "the courts would decide."

11 comments:

  1. So ridiculous. Should be taken a step further and have the property taken away from the developer and given to the city for public use of some sort.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That was a Canadian National Railways building, not CPR or Canadian Pacific Railway. Along Wellington was a long building where freight would be transferred between trucks and railroad boxcars. Further south were the stockyards, also served by the CNR.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I live a few blocks away from this corner and can tell you those condo owners will be in for a big surprise with noise associated with all the trains.
    Seriously, when is Montreal going to get it's act together? How about $100,000 fine, maybe that would get some attention. As well as a reconstruction of the building incorporated into the façade.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonne nouvelle que Benoit Dorais s'interesse au dossier; éspérons que le nouveau construction integrera belle et bien une representation de l'ancien édifice, qui est devenu un vrai landmark du quartier.

    Avec des gens comme Kristian et Benoit dans nos communautés, nous pouvons au moins avoir de l'éspoir à ce que le redéveloppement des quartiers négligés de Montréal soient fait avec un peu de gout et respect! Bravo Benoit and here's hoping the courts apply the full letter of the law to this project, and that it becomes an example...

    ReplyDelete
  5. There are dozens of similar industrial zones and odd-ball properties in Montreal that condo lords (many non-resident foreign nationals) can't wait to snap up and sell to gullible people who are either naive or have no clue that their surroundings will likely be user-unfriendly: busy railway lines, potential highway on-off ramps, nearby manufacturers of foul-smelling or potentially hazardous products, radio or hydro towers, etc.

    Frankly, I highly doubt that the stockyard building will be replaced brick-by-brick on the same spot or elsewhere.

    In Europe, some cities actually do go to the trouble of jacking up heritage buildings onto wheels and moving them to another spot, but the only such case in Montreal that I can think of at the moment is the former St. Paul's Presbyterian Church on Dorchester Blvd. as noted in Wikipedia below:

    In 1931, St. Paul's Church was slated to be demolished to make way for the construction of Central Station. It was saved from demolition by the Pères de Sainte-Croix who purchased the building for the symbolic sum of $1. Over sixty days it was dismantled stone by stone and moved to the grounds of the Collège Saint-Laurent. It was reassembled by architect Lucien Parent who modified the church slightly for its new role as a Roman Catholic church. It was also raised by one floor to allow for a theatre, Salle Émile-Legault to be built underneath. The theatre was home to the well-known Compagnons de Saint-Laurent French-language theatre troupe. It became vacant following the secularization of the institution, and was converted into a museum in 1979. The Musée des maîtres et artisans du Québec is today located in what was originally St. Paul's Church.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Urban Legend,

    I believe you inadvertently wrote stockyard building instead of the CNR freight office that was demolished at Wellington and Bridge.

    The very similar former stockyard administration building is further south on on the west side of Bridge Street, just north of Mill Street. Costco now stands where the stockyard buildings were but the stockyard administration office was right on Bridge. I'm no longer in Montreal but I believe that building is still standing although long ago closed.

    I used to work at the stockyards many years ago. Some caleche owners kept their horses and carriages there.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You'll find a photo of the closed stockyard administration building here:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotoproze/2234132694/in/photostream/

    ReplyDelete
  8. I was indeed referring to the demolition of the CNR freight office and not the former, now-vacant stockyard building situated further south on Bridge Street. See its Google street photo here:

    https://www.google.ca/maps/@45.486952,-73.552628,3a,75y,229.44h,98.67t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s991UvliRkDZhv5sldHvFtQ!2e0

    What exactly can be done with this abandoned relic is debatable, other than perhaps to turn it into a museum, which is unlikely though given its relatively off-the-beaten-track location served by limited-schedule bus route 74 and the nearby bike path. Vehicular traffic can be problematic near rush hour. Anyway, Costco probably covets the spot to eventually expand its parking lot.

    I can easily envision this old stockyard building being likewise unceremoniously demolished some day at dawn during the summer holidays when most people aren't paying attention. Oops--too late! Another piece of Montreal's history relegated to oblivion. Here we go again! Nobody gets properly sued, it's all eventually forgotten, and someone's pockets are jingling with ill-gotten cash.

    Now read below of the huge stockyard fire as reported in the August 18, 1954 edition of the Montreal Gazette.

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=Fr8DH2VBP9sC&dat=19540818&printsec=frontpage&hl=en

    ReplyDelete
  9. Urban Legend,

    Thanks for updating me on the status of the old stockyard office building. You are probably right about its eventual fate. And thanks for the newspaper article about the stockyard fire.

    You're probably also right about the CNR freighthouse not being rebuilt. It's a shame when buildings are torn down without an attempt to find a suitable new use for them.

    While Montreal may seem like it's changing overnight, you should see Vancouver. Entire streets can look completely different in a matter of a decade!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Azrielli is pushing daisies? Good. Now that was a real, genuine scumbag.

    He even sued someone who wrote a letter to the editor published in Le Devoir, deploring the "azrielliation" of the Mile-End. How scumbaggy is this???

    ReplyDelete

Love to get comments! Please, please, please speak your mind !
Links welcome - please google "how to embed a link" it'll make your comment much more fun and clickable.