The six numbered dots represent the new and useless traffic lights |
On one 400 metre stretch of Decarie between St. James and De Maisonneuve there are now four sets of traffic lights, two brand new and one that has been uselessly delaying people for about four years. That's a new light every 100 metres. It must be some sort of new world record.
Compare that to a much-busier 700 metre stretch of Sherbrooke between Clifton and Girouard - a strip with far more pedestrians and traffic - it does fine with four lights over almost twice the distance.
A pointless luminous delay machine has been installed at Crowley and Upper Lachine, which serves no purpose: traffic to Crowley is virtually nil and a stop sign would be entirely adequate.
Girouard light: city's dumbest? |
northbound through the green before another 54 second red cycle begins. Those who sniff a green on the horizon motor full speed, knowing they'll be punished by the clock for missing their chance. Once again, a simple stop sign would be adequate and would lead to much calmer driving.
Stop signs encourage motorists to keep their eyes on the road - pedestrians, cylclists and other cars - rather than up in the air, mesmerized by a green, yellow or red light bulb.
Montreal West thrives without a single traffic light - including at a busy five-way intersection of St. James and Westminister full of school kids - where there has never been an accident.
Nuns Island hasn't got a single traffic light and has useful structure like roundabouts, putting to rest the nonsense of Montreal drivers being somehow worse than those of other cities.
Needless to say the public had no say in this expensive money and time grab.
Lives, in tiny increments, are being confiscated by nameless pencilnecks planning roads in locked offices.
It isn't cheap either: traffic lights are costly to purchase, maintain and operate, whereas stop signs are almost free.
A traffic light is a punishment. A stop sign is a chance at redemption. Don't believe me? Drive through the intersection of St. James and Westminister. You'll see the goodwill and cooperation that motorists are capable of and you'll feel good after getting through.
Unlike in many other cities, traffic lights in Montreal are not made with an intelligent design, so you routinely see a long line of cars waiting at a red while no vehicles are trying to come the other way.
Is there corruption behind this illogical slavery to the traffic light? Are we living under government by insurance company whose next task is to force you to wear helmets behind the wheel?
The concept of a traffic light is philosophically offensive. It's signal that the government feels entitled to arbitrarily confiscate your time in a paternalistic manner which does not require explaining. No attempt to justify these often pointless delays is ever offered. Let's start dumping these devices now.
"Luminous delay machine?" Sounds like a Velvet Underground cover band.
ReplyDeleteHow smart traffic signals may ease your commute:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bbc.com/autos/story/20150317-how-smart-traffic-signals-may-ease-your-commute
"Montreal West thrives without a single traffic light - including at a busy five-way intersection of St. James and Westminister full of school kids - where there has never been an accident."
ReplyDeleteI know you were being a little facetious because a Coolopolis entry from Nov. 5, 2012 complete with photos shows a multi-car accident at that very intersection.
I specifically phoned Montreal West to ask about the history of accidents at that corner and they told me that they don't recall any ever.
ReplyDeleteThere might have been an accident 70 years ago, granted, but even then I think that one was a bit further down the road.
And then there are the traffic lights in Westmount along Sherbrooke and Ste-Catherine - with their 20-second dedicated pedestrian cycles - even with no pedestrians around. Why not have a button that pedestrians can push to activate the cycle?
ReplyDeleteCote St. Luc and Westminster - one of the longest full cycles.
Queen Mary and Ellerdale (Hampstead) - very busy with just stop signs - I have never seen an accident there.
I hate lights just as much as any other driver or pedestrian might but I'd just like to point out that you didn't seem to mention why light #1, the "56 second long light" on Girouard was installed in the first place. That one actually serves a purpose; they re-opened the street to two lane traffic and simultaneously re-opened the on ramp to the 15 South. It's not an ideal way to make use of an existing on ramp but it's not a "useless light", as an NDG resident I'm glad the light was installed so that the ramp could be re-opened, having that ramp closed the last few years was one of the biggest traffic headaches in the neighbourhood, the only other 15 south ramp nearby was up by Monkland and that area couldn't handle the extra traffic. Meanwhile lights 3, 4 and 6 were installed because those are going to be the 3 main entrances to the hospital. There's arguably too many in that 8 block radius but due to the high traffic in that area, those lights need to be there to allow cars to exit the hospital grounds, without lights there, the constant flow of traffic would make it impossible for cars to pull out onto the constantly flowing road and knowing how people drive in this city, there would surely be accidents there daily if there was no light to regulate the right of way (but hey, at least they'd be right next to the new hospital if they get t-boned... right?).
ReplyDelete