Tuesday, October 28, 2008

How gorgeous greystone rowhouses of Jeanne Mance were saved from demolition

 
Here's the story of how that beautiful postcard-worthy row of houses between 2020 and 2092 Jeanne Mance between Sherbrooke and President Kennedy was saved from the wrecking ball in the 70s.
  During those dark years it seemed that half the city's most glorious architecture was being gleefully demolished while the other half was being burnt to the ground by crazy - or perhaps not so crazy - firebugs.   So when real estate speculators purchased the greystones just north of the Place des Arts metro and left them semi-abandoned with the express intention of demolishing the gorgeous row of homes, things looked bleak. Only three of the buildings were relatively safely in the hands of small private owners.
   The speculators applied to the city to demolish everything on the block and to evict the tenants.
   Architect Michael Fish heard about the situation because he taught a tenant, a blond girl Liz, in a course on conservation at Sir George Williams of Concordia. She asked Fish to help her try to save the buildings. He agreed.
   Fish then invited the James MacGregor group at the University Settlement which included Peter Sijpkes and John Gardiner to help as architects-organizers but they declined, so Fish took on the role.
   Coincidentally, as part the Save Montreal Group, Fish and others had previously visited Minister of Cities and Towns, Victor Goldbloom, to ask him to pass a law giving cities and towns six months to study demolition permits before issuing them. The intention was to allow time to consider alterantives to demolition. Goldbloom agreed.
   The Jeanne Mance group - represented by lawyer Michael Berger, who had also handled the Van Horne Mansion case - asked for a legal injunction to stop the demolitions on Jeanne Mance. With Goldbloom's law in hand, the group went to visit Yvon Lamarre of the City of Montreal, who agreed to use Goldbloom's new law to delay the demolition.
   The group then offered to buy the houses for $900,000. Fish put down $1,000 as a downpayment. The group then had six months to get a mortgage and buy the buildings.
   The province gradually came around to classifying the façades on the street under the orders of Minister L’Allier as well as one of the buildings (2066 Jeanne Mance) in its entirety, inside and out.
   The group then spent three years submitting different feasibility studies to CHMC to approve mortgages, all of which included a variety of ownership models for the various buildings.
   Each successive scheme included suggestions for improvements as suggested by CMHC officials. But after the local CMHC rejected each submission, the group was reduced to intensive lobbying.    They were turned down time everywhere.
   After several months, with the only victory having been in obtaining an extension on the option to buy, the sun finally shined on the conservationists. Richard Cannings, a former journalist from Channel 12 and a close friend of Fish, phoned Fish to ask if he wanted the ear of André Ouellette.
   Cannings had become close to Ouellette for whom he worked as a political attaché. Ouellette was the federal cabinet minister responsible for the CMHC. Fish asked Cannings to explain to Ouellette the merits of the project. Cannings managed to persuade Oullette and soon the CMHC HQ gave the green light to the Jeanne Mance Project.
   The CMHC then purchased the properties for $700,000 cash and the project was finally in gear.
   But the CMHC local office - apparently not thrilled to have been ordered from above to reverse its refusal - argued that the group's projected budget was unrealistic.
   After the group did the working drawings for the whole block of 13 buildings, CMHC told the group to do all of the drawings over, focusing on only two buildings. They also ordered the group to redraft to have each building in separate drawings. After another year the drawings were done and the first two buildings were completed on budget.
   The next year the CMHC greenlighted five more buildings. They also came in on budget and the next year the remainder were done.
   By the end, however, co-op residents had taken over control from the professionals. The residents were originally run by a young blonde woman, then a Russian student and then by Esmond Choueke, another recent commerce graduate.
Esmond Choueke
   Choueke and Ian Fairlie were removed from the residents committee and a new executive oversaw the work on the last group of buildings.
   The residents sought a deal to allow the last five buildings be given a more lavish treatment. Several mysterious money shortages ensued, as more than 11 agencies, federal, provincial and municipal contributed to the project and none knew or wanted to know what the others were doing. The surfeit of cash from so many sources opened the door to some confused bookkeeping by the residents committee.
   In spite of the problems at the end, the project was considered a massive success. The contractors and architects received medals and certificates of excellence from the Governor-General in Toronto. The positive outcome allowed several other similar projects in the city to be realized, the most important of which was the Milton Park Project.
   Choueke stayed in the house of which he was the only occupant. The executive of the co-op tried to move him out of his house and expel him from the co-op and made his life miserable with heavy lawsuits for years. He lost every case. Matters were decided in his entire favour by the Supreme Court of Canada. He still lives there quite happily and has extensive records on the history of the property.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:27 am

    Ah, John Gardiner, saviour of old urban spades and lover of parks…

    Or is he?

    One thing for sure, you don’t fuck with John Gardiner. No sir!

    Back in the heydays of Jean Doré and the RCM, a leitmotiv often heard was “save the Mountain”!!!

    And so they valiantly endeavoured to save the mountain… A good example is the city exchanging an uninspiring piece of land on the Mountain (located at the northwest corner of Pine avenue and Redpath Crescent), ostentibly to add to the Mont-Royal park.

    Except that as a park extension (pun intended), it is utterly useless; the property was a quarry and is therefore squarely excavated. It is unrealistic to consider this as a park, given that it is surrounded by very lavish houses.

    So, as I said, they exchanced the land with some other piece of property the city owns.

    They actually were to give the developper nothing less than a full third (1/3) of Ahuntsic park, the huge 400m x 300m square park right by the Henri-Bourassa Métro station!!!!

    Yes, you read it properly: the city was about to exchange a tiny lot on Pine Avenue for a 100m x 400m section of a huge city park to build a mini-mall, an underground parking lot, a bus terminal and 10 stories of condos.

    The catch was that this section of the park was occupied by a park-and-ride lot specially carved out of the park for the benefit of Laval and Montréal-Nord residents who could then ride the Métro downtown.

    So at first glance, it did not look like a park, and so John Gardiner was hoping that nobody would notice anything.

    Except, of course, the locals, and especially the city councillor, Pierre Lachapelle. Even though he was of the same party of Jean Doré, he fought against the project.

    And he won. They never built the condos and the minimal (but they built the bus terminal, which is one of the best, at least when compared to the horror erected at Côte-Vertu or the useless wonder at Fairview), they removed the parking lot, and redecorated the park.

    A very good deal, for the residents, yes, but the ungratefuls kicked Lachapelle out when Bourque kicked Doré out.

    And for defying the mayor and winning, Lachapelle has been blacklisted everywhere, all the way to hell and back; he has yet to hold a steady job ever since…

    You just do not fuck with John Gardiner.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:21 am

    I recall telling myself how lucky I'd be living in this area. The credit belongs to those houses.

    I still can't believe I successfully lived ther for more than 3 years now close to McGil ghetto. I simply love this neighborhood and will fight to maintain those houses.

    Thank you very much for your article. I was actually searching for news regading the gaz station being suddenly closed at the corner of Jeanne Mance and Sherbrooke :

    What happened ? Not a big deal though,w missing a gaz station in my quartier...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I recently came across this post. For the record, I am the 'blonde girl named Liz'. It was an amazing project.
    – Lis Erling Bailly, Victoria BC 2017

    ReplyDelete

Love to get comments! Please, please, please speak your mind !
Links welcome - please google "how to embed a link" it'll make your comment much more fun and clickable.