Friday, November 05, 2010

New Montreal trends, palimony, car taxes and graffiti deaths

Palimony on its way to the Kweebeck!
   After one judge nixed a demand for palimony, an Appeals Court judge yesterday agreed with a woman that her billionaire Quebecois ex-boyfriend should be obliged to pay herr alimony in spite of never having been offiicially married. As you know there is no such thing as a common law relationship in Quebec because we have civil law, not common law. One of the wrinkles is that the court system has never awarded alimony payments to a woman who was not officially married. A split parent with child custody will get child support payments - Quebec orders lower payments than in the rest of Canada btw - but that's a separate thing. Palimony is accepted everywhere else since the famous Lee Marvin case, so it should come as no shock. But presumably the Quebec billionaire will appeal this ruling all the way to the Supreme Court if need be so perhaps it's still a bit off. Palimony could benefit a lot of women here where most cohabiting relationships in Quebec are of the non-married variety. So the advantage of remaining unmarried will disappear and the crazy low marriage rate in this province could go up.
   The ain reason we don't already have palimony in Kweebeck is because the big women's group here opposed it. I once asked them why, as it would benefit a lot of women. The woman who answered said it was too long ago and couldn't remember and that it was a philosophical decision. 

Montreal announces a new car tax that punishes families, people with kids.
In an extremely lame development Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay announced that he's slapping two new taxes on car owners regardless of how often they drive, why they drive, where they drive. Westmount Mayor Peter Trent agrees with it, which further proves that it's a bad idea. 
   Tremblay wants to cut down on drivers and encourage people to take public transit. Of course this makes no sense as the transgressors over the traffic issues are largely people who do not live on the island and will be spared of this ridiculous tax. Never has any municipal party discussed serious bureaucratic cutting to balance budgets.
Montreal's graffiti causes four death this year alone
 Four young Montreal men whose lives were ahead of them are simply no more. It's an outrage and those who lured them into this crazy cult should be scrutinized with rigor. Griffiti artists you need deprogramming. There are much better outlets to one's artistic expression than to impolitely impose your initials on public or private property only to have it erased a few days later. You've got the internet now and other services which now encourage art to be displayed and sold without need for a gallery setting.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:27 pm

    "There is ample room to cut. For example many of the poverty-housing initiatives are absurd and involve massive expense. "

    You seem to think you know what you are talking about here... Let's see you demonstrate it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I know something about this stuff anonymous but I shall tell my story another place and another time. BTW, ever consider putting a name next to your words?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Funny I have 2 kids a wife .My kids have karate and piano class .We shop ,travel and are fairly normal. One thing we dont have is a car.We use public transit and rent when we need to.I am all for a car tax,tolls and whatever could roll back the exponteial growth of the car pool in Montreal and burbs

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:56 pm

    I'm assuming that John has a good paying job...

    Car owners are already paying a surtax and we are taxed extra on gas. The city should learn to manage money better.
    Heck, Bixi has been a financial failure yet "greenies" are pushing it...

    Public transit in Montreal is rather piss-poor. When I was a student (20 years ago) I had no choice. Lately I tried it again to see how it would be - I can't believe how much the system has regressed.

    As it is, I commute from the WI to downtown. The average time is 2.5 hours/day. Needless to say it has a huge impact on my quality of life. Public transport would easily had 50% to that time if not more... We don't all have 9 to 5 jobs...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anon
    I'll give you a few tricks and I do have a job that pays a little over 40 grand. First choose where you live based on public transit access and proximity to your job .I live in Villeray 150 metres to two Metro stations,14 minute commute( moved here 8 years ago before Mile End expanded).What I gave up was a big back yard a thermopump and 2.5 hours listening to bad radio daily.
    Also most people who commute with their cars always slag public transit its just what you gotta do. Having traveled a fair bit in both Europe and North America our transit system is one of the best in he world and amongst the cheapest.I am happy your lifestyle choice comes with some costs and I hope more are on the way. Your use of your car has a direct impact on my kids future, that's why I don't have one. Sorry for the sanctimony but that's really why I don't have one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:42 am

    John:
    What a joke.
    I've been across Europe as well as Asia and our public transit system is lacking at the very best.

    Moreover, the tax is also bears little relation to how much one drives or contributes to pollution. In implementing the tax, you push out the marginal drivers: the one's that don't drive very much anyways.

    Lastly, do you suppose that everyone should move within minutes of a metro station? If everyone follows your advice then property values near metro stations would skyrocket. You and your "over 40k/year" salary would be displaced.

    Maybe it's poetic justice you deal with a shitty commute.

    ReplyDelete

Love to get comments! Please, please, please speak your mind !
Links welcome - please google "how to embed a link" it'll make your comment much more fun and clickable.